The Israel-Gaza war and wider Middle-East tensions (2 Viewers)

If by "bare minimum" you mean a temporary fix that won't do shit to fix the problem, then sure. The horrible living standards are but one of the many symptoms of this conflict. As long as the two keep beefing, boosting living standards will continue to be a futile and cosmetic short-term bandaid that will need to be CONSTANTLY rebuilt. It'll help individuals in the meantime, sure, but it will bring this conflict no closer to its end.
Well then what would be better? People living or dying isn't cosmetic or futile. Again, I didn't say it would fix everything, but it is the prerequisite to any actual plan
 
If by "bare minimum" you mean a temporary fix that won't do shit to fix the problem, then sure. The horrible living standards are but one of the many symptoms of this conflict. As long as the two keep beefing, boosting living standards will continue to be a futile and cosmetic short-term bandaid that will need to be CONSTANTLY rebuilt. It'll help individuals in the meantime, sure, but it will bring this conflict no closer to its end.
Cosmetic?

COSMETIC!?

Next you'll be saying barrages of missiles are BAD VIBES
 
Y'all need to calm down. From a geopolitical perspective, improving the living standards won't do shit for the resolution of this conflict. This conflict is not happening because of people's living standards. You're giving both sides WAY too much credit. This conflict is happening because of longstanding internal ethnic competition within the Middle East (Israel and Jews being seen as illegitimate; Iran vs Saudi Arabia/cultural and religious domination; radicalism) AND because of the unwelcomed influence of external powers (USA, Europe, Russia + probably even China).

The resolution of THESE issues are the prerequisite for stability in the area, not the living standards of the general population. This is global and regional macropolitics, not a local protest. Consolidating power and expanding territory is what these parties are playing for and until one of the parties gets it, they will continue to fight.

Sorry if this disappoints you, but if the Palestinian people suddenly received healthcare, education, shelter and food security right now, Hamas is NOT going to humbly put their weapons down and say "Thanks hun, that's all we wanted." The population's living standards is NOT Hamas' ultimate goal or ANYONE'S ultimate goal in the Middle East. I know you guys want Hamas to be 'saviors' and 'defenders' of Palestine, but they're not.
 
Last edited:
You need to get a grip of yourself. Very little to do with living standards?

THEY'RE IN AN OPEN AIR PRISON THATS JUST BEEN BOMBED INTO FAMNINE.

if it's an "open-air prison" then why do thousands of Palestinians with European passports choose to leave the first world and move to the so-called "open-air prison"?
 
First of all, I'd rather not be talked to like I'm a naive idiot.

I don't have a solution for Israel/Gaza, and I don't think anyone else has a realistic one either, but people living or dying is important, is a human right, and is the most pressing issue at the moment. I highly doubt anyone here thinks that Hamas is the savior or defender of the Palestinians, and I'm not disappointed, I'm nervous about the literal lives of the people involved and its impact on the rest of the world
 
if it's an "open-air prison" then why do thousands of Palestinians with European passports choose to leave the first world and move to the so-called "open-air prison"?
Just because you put things in quotation marks doesn't make them any less true.

It's an open air prison, it's ethnic cleansing, and it's an ethnostate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: COB
First of all, I'd rather not be talked to like I'm a naive idiot.

Definitely not the intention and apologies if I sounded patronizing.

but people living or dying is important, is a human right, and is the most pressing issue at the moment.

For US, yes it is. But I've said this before, this kind of moral litigation is absolutely futile on the geopolitical arena. This conflict involves the highest possible powers on the planet. They have the influence and resources to wipe entire populations from the earth. There IS no real tangible authority above them. Abstract moral standards and arbitrary so-called "ethics" lose all authority on the global level. History shows us that time and time again.
 
if it's an "open-air prison" then why do thousands of Palestinians with European passports choose to leave the first world and move to the so-called "open-air prison"?
yes. there's just so much migration INTO Gaza/Palestinian territories! you nailed it, the Palestians with European passports do totally disprove the "genocide happening right now" theory. wow I love this analysis.
 
Let's not do this.
Lets Go Nbc GIF by One Chicago


jk
 
For US, yes it is. But I've said this before, this kind of moral litigation is absolutely futile on the geopolitical arena. This conflict involves the highest possible powers on the planet. They have the influence and resources to wipe entire populations from the earth. There IS no real tangible authority above them. Abstract moral standards and so-called "ethics" lose all authority on the global level. History shows us that time and time again.
You do understand that governments are beholden to their citizens right? In democracies that's elections, but even in dictatorships they can and do crumble if they piss the wrong people off. Geopolitics is still affected by national politics
 
You do understand that governments are beholden to their citizens right? In democracies that's elections, but even in dictatorships they can and do crumble if they piss the wrong people off. Geopolitics is still affected by national politics
UNTIL the people ACTUALLY organize and PHYSICALLY exert influence and MAKE it crumble (riots, revolutions etc), governments are beholden to their citizens only abstractly; in theory; by social agreement. Not by any real tangible force or authority. When dictators massacre entire towns, the universe doesn't come down, deduct 10 years from their life, and send them to Human Rights 101. To the universe, such standards are nothing but fiction. The only authority higher than terrorists, conquerors and dictators are...well, more powerful terrorists, conquerors and dictators.
 
Last edited:
if it's an "open-air prison" then why do thousands of Palestinians with European passports choose to leave the first world and move to the so-called "open-air prison"?

the girls are dismissing, twisting, and making fun of this question, but not actually answering it.
 
Sorry if this disappoints you, but if the Palestinian people suddenly received healthcare, education, shelter and food security right now, Hamas is NOT going to humbly put their weapons down and say "Thanks hun, that's all we wanted." The population's living standards is NOT Hamas' ultimate goal or ANYONE'S ultimate goal in the Middle East. I know you guys want Hamas to be 'saviors' and 'defenders' of Palestine, but they're not.

this.

the girls in this thread are SO out-of-touch with what Hamas and the majority of Palestinians want.

hint: they want all of the Jews to leave.
 
You need to get a grip of yourself.

THEY'RE IN AN OPEN AIR PRISON THATS JUST BEEN BOMBED INTO FAMNINE.

why are you SO ANGRY?

you clearly shouldn't be taking part in this discussion if the topic is so sensitive to you.
 
How many times must people point out that criticising Israel is not criticising Jews, and defending Gazans and Palestinians is not defending Hamas.

It's not just moopy it's everywhere. I might start wearing a DISCLAIMER T-SHIRT.

Infuriating.
 
I'm not sure how this discussion can ever evolve if you can't get past BASE ONE on the general majority reaction and viewpoint of the war, and where the anger and protests are coming from.
 
Emphasis, darling, not anger.

ok, sorry. i must have misread what with the caps.

Just because you put things in quotation marks doesn't make them any less true.

It's an open air prison, it's ethnic cleansing, and it's an ethnostate.

it's an "open air prison" because terrorists (literally terrorists) govern it.

it's not an ethnic cleansing because ethnic cleansing and genocide entail INTENT, and Israel intends on terminating Hamas, not Gazans. the belief that Israel INTENDS to kill all Gazans is antisemitic.

it is an ethnostate because Jews have been slaughtered in Europe and oppressed in the Middle East forever and have not had a home to flee from antisemitism until 1948.

the Holocaust, and the current disgusting wave of vile antisemitism, only reaffirm how important it is for the Jews to have their own state.
 
How many times must people point out that criticising Israel is not criticising Jews, and defending Gazans and Palestinians is not defending Hamas.
And how many times must others point out that some of us aren't "defending" or "criticizing" EITHER? If I criticize your understanding of Hamas and their geopolitical strategy, I'm not "defending" Israel by extension, and vice-versa.

Not everyone is interested in expressing online outrage and playing the blame game, because it's futile and ARBITRARY.
 
It is an open air prison because Gazans can not freely leave and there is literally a fence round it.

It is ethnic cleansing because state actors, including Netanyahu and the Israeli ambassador to the UK, have stated their intentions such. It is not antisemitism to say Israel intends to kill or remove all Gazans, it is repeating Israel's stated policy goal.

Glad we agree that it is an ethnostate though.
 
How many times must people point out that criticising Israel is not criticising Jews
I do think it is important acknowledge that, from some quarters, the criticism of Israel is in part driven by anti-semitism (you don’t have to look hard online to find it). The same individuals don’t come anywhere close to the same amount of criticism of Myanmar or China in the conflict they are engaging with their Muslim populations.
 
And how many times must others point out that some of us aren't "defending" or "criticizing" EITHER? If I criticize your understanding of Hamas and their geopolitical strategy, I'm not "defending" Israel by extension, and vice-versa.

Not everyone is interested in expressing online outrage and playing the blame game, because it's futile and ARBITRARY.

I refer you to your earlier point that I quoted, which contradicts your point now.
 
It is an open air prison because Gazans can not freely leave and there is literally a fence round it.

It is ethnic cleansing because state actors, including Netanyahu and the Israeli ambassador to the UK, have stated their intentions such. It is not antisemitism to say Israel intends to kill or remove all Gazans, it is repeating Israel's stated policy goal.

Glad we agree that it is an ethnostate though.

when Gazans freely "left" they slaughtered 1,200 Israelis. that's why there's a fence.

where did Netanyahu express intent to ethnically cleanse all Gazans? i wanna see the receipts. as far as my knowledge goes, SOME Israeli officials have and they will eventually be trialed.
 
I do think it is important acknowledge that, from some quarters, the criticism of Israel is in part driven by anti-semitism (you don’t have to look hard online to find it). The same individuals don’t come anywhere close to the same amount of criticism of Myanmar or China in the conflict they are engaging with their Muslim populations.

I agree you don’t have to look hard to find it, but I’d also argue that’s it pretty easy to distinguish between criticism of the Israeli government and crisiticism of Israel, Jews or Judaism.

The blanket and default accusations of anti-semitism aren't helpful; I'd even go so far as to say they undermine any pro-Israel rhetoric.
 
Ahh, so all Gazans are Hamas are they? If I was so flippant about Israeli's or Jews you'd be the first to criticise me.

it's easy to conflate the two because the majority of Gazans support Hamas.

also majority of Gazans believe what Hamas did was "right" according to polls.
 
I refer you to your earlier point that I quoted, which contradicts your point now.
Yeah nah it doesn't. I said that in the context of the discussion about living standards. It was not said as an accusation, but as a benefit of the doubt. Joanne just took it there.

"Defend" whichever side happens to appease your conscience, but the fact remains that the Palestinian people's well-being is NOT Hamas' ultimate goal, or that of any major player in Middle Eastern politics.
 
when Gazans freely "left" they slaughtered 1,200 Israelis. that's why there's a fence.

where did Netanyahu express intent to ethnically cleanse all Gazans? i wanna see the receipts. as far as my knowledge goes, SOME Israeli officials have and they will eventually be trialed.

Netenyahu doesn't need to go on record and state he's ethnically cleansing Gaza. I don't recall any regime in the modern era that has ever caused mass casualties of innocent people to call it anything other than a military operation. The deaths and the bombings and the starvation and the disease and the horrors in general are the receipts.

Saying some officials are guilty and will be trialled feels awfully dismissive of what is an unprecedented act of military might on an enormous group of innocent civilians.
 
Yeah nah it doesn't. I said that in the context of the discussion about living standards. It was not said as an accusation, but as a benefit of the doubt. Joanne just took it there.

"Defend" whichever side happens to appease your conscience, but the fact remains that the Palestinian people's well-being is NOT Hamas' ultimate goal, or any major player in Middle Eastern politics.

I'm talking about you saying suggesting that "you guys" (moopy posters) want Hamas to be the saviours of Palestine. There isn't a single post on moopy that has ever suggested this to be the case.
 
Netenyahu doesn't need to go on record and state he's ethnically cleansing Gaza. I don't recall any regime in the modern era that has ever caused mass casualties of innocent people to call it anything other than a military operation. The deaths and the bombings and the starvation and the disease and the horrors in general are the receipts.

Saying some officials are guilty and will be trialled feels awfully dismissive of what is an unprecedented act of military might on an enormous group of innocent civilians.

if Israel is trialed by the ICC, what will determine whether it's genocide or not is intent - not some passive-aggressive queens on an online forum (me, i'm the passive-aggressive queen on an online forum).

for it to be considered a genocide by the ICC, it will have to be proven that a certain amount of key officials have expressed the intent of ethnically cleansing Gazans. they will go through all orders and documents to verify this.

for all intents and purposes..

genocide
/ˈdʒɛnəsʌɪd/
noun

  1. the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group.
 
I'm talking about you saying suggesting that "you guys" (moopy posters) want Hamas to be the saviours of Palestine. There isn't a single post on moopy that has ever suggested this to be the case.
Yes that's what I'm talking about too. Let me rephrase it: "I know IT WOULD BE NICE TO BELIEVE that Hamas is genuinely fighting for Palestinians' living standards, but they're not." It wasn't an accusation. My point was defend whatever side you want, just know WHAT you're defending.
 
the article is behind a pay wall @COB

also "in private encounters" girl these are ethnic cleansings allegations, the tea needs to be hotter than this lukewarm rooibos.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom