Ligerindie007
Kingbluewhales007
I suxs maths 

8/9 days tell dis numpteeee gon whoop not dat numpteeee place be any better
hey ho
Big ligers kool




Big ligers kool
Those clickbait style adverts are really selling the qualityLeanTossup’s website looks like it’s made by a teenager.
They got hustleThose clickbait style adverts are really selling the quality
Ewwwwww!!!!!!View attachment 27676
Get the neoliberal TERF in the bin please.
Basically my thought process. I’ve seen her being interviewed several times and she just recycles the same jargon over and over, honestly she comes across as if she’s an AI politician.Reeves is the kind of mindless technocrat who stands for absolutely nothing except "competency". it's such a red flag that Starmer has made her his number two.
It's classic bullshit tho' - "we'd be willing to meet with her" is essentially neutral; it's not endorsement, it's not rejection. And that's Labour all over right now - they stand for absolutely fuck all. It's all potentially this and willing to that - there's no substance. If ever they could have afforded to be bold, it's now - the polls have barely moved apart from Farage boosting Reform and they could have really had a vision for improving the UK and getting us back from the withered husk the Tories have left after 14 years. But no, it's all tiptoe tiptoe, don't upset the billionaires, don't upset the terfs, don't upset the Tories.
In the doing so, they legitimise so much horseshit. Rowling should be told that her ill-founded opinions are one thing but science, medicine and government policy do not bend to them. But no, gently gently guys, don't upset the fascists. Labour are cunts and I want at least 50% of the shadow cabinet dead in a ditch.
that's the worst part. meet her... why?she's influential only as a bigot on twitter. she's not important in any sphere related to government or frankly the wider culture. she's only in the news because the right wing media have an anti-trans agenda. stop legitimising them and don't give her a platform!
a leader in WHAT! she's really NOT. she's an author who is widely perceived as having trashed her own reputation. her current literary output isn't bestselling and the last entry was widely and rightly panned for having zero literary quality and being filled with fictional hate tweets. why is she being looked to as a thought leader? purely because the right wing media have this culture war agenda to push. if she wasn't famously anti-trans nobody would be talking about her exception once a year when some Potter gossip occurred.
also who are these "massive amounts of people"? anyone i speak to in real life when her name comes up falls into two categories - they know she's a terf and hate her or they don't know she's a terf and have no particular opinion of her. I don't think that's my echo chamber at play. who are these masses who look to her as a leader?
the idea that she's just not relevant to us because we don't agree with her is insane bothsides-ism. she's just a woman who got rich writing a popular book series. culture has moved on.
Craig Williams was projected to be the only Tory MP left in Wales![]()
It was headline news on BBC just mere days ago. She's no different to the other bigots who spout this nonsense, but the media pays more attention because she's famous and a billionaire.I'd agree that Joanne's stance on trans rights is widely known, but I'm not convinced the constant dribble of bile she spews on social media necessarily cuts through to the same extent. I think she's been quite careful to lead from behind so that when she does put her head above the parapet, the mainstream media still regard it as "news".
a leader in WHAT! she's really NOT. she's an author who is widely perceived as having trashed her own reputation. her current literary output isn't bestselling and the last entry was widely and rightly panned for having zero literary quality and being filled with fictional hate tweets. why is she being looked to as a thought leader? purely because the right wing media have this culture war agenda to push. if she wasn't famously anti-trans nobody would be talking about her exception once a year when some Potter gossip occurred.
also who are these "massive amounts of people"? anyone i speak to in real life when her name comes up falls into two categories - they know she's a terf and hate her or they don't know she's a terf and have no particular opinion of her. I don't think that's my echo chamber at play. who are these masses who look to her as a leader?
the idea that she's just not relevant to us because we don't agree with her is insane bothsides-ism. she's just a woman who got rich writing a popular book series. culture has moved on.
I think I disagree with this. She just isn’t relevant to us as being opposed to her ideology. Would we ever kick off in this way about them meeting with a trans activist? No.
She'll be flat out, slurring racist shit and texting Boris by 12.30.How will she possibly stay sober past 11pm?
Brave assumption that she manages it past 11am, frankly.How will she possibly stay sober past 11pm?
Well it DID!Sometimes I feel like if a bird shat on me Shee would pipe in and go ‘WELL IT HAS TO SHIT SOMEWHERE’.